The Facts
A school district hired Ho to work
Tuesdays and Thursdays as an hourly classroom tutor. Her supervisor, Colleen
Spafford, informed Ho that under new state legislation, she must be fingerprinted
to continue working with students in the classroom. Spafford did not tell
Ho when or where to do this. Spafford simply gave Ho a telephone number
to make arrangements for fingerprinting. Spafford hoped that Ho would fulfill
this state mandate, but she never checked to see whether Ho complied.
Eight days after Ho began working,
she drove her car from the Cal Poly campus, where she was enrolled as a
student, to San Luis High School to be fingerprinted. Ho intended to go
directly home afterwards. She had no plans to work or speak with Spafford
that day. As Ho drove away after being fingerprinted, she struck Tognazzini's
motorcycle, injuring him.
Tognazzini sued the District on the
theory of "respondeat superior" because he believed Ho was acting within
the scope of her employment at the time of the accident.
You Decide
Was Ho working at the time of the accident, thereby making her employer
also liable for Tognazzini's injuries?
<<Click Here for the Answer>>
This Page Sponsored By
Copyright
© 2000, Law Offices of George A. Boyle
|